ICONOS FINALES-TRAZADOS

Cristina Baz Larrañaga Lawyers

Multidisciplinary law firm specialized in Family Law, Mediation, and Foreign Affairs

BOOK APPOINTMENT

Insolvency law

Translation generated by AI. Access the original version

Communication of insufficiency of active mass in response to a credit claim against the estate

Insolvency law

In the insolvency proceedings of a company , a creditor filed a claim (insolvency incident) to have a credit against the estate recognized. The insolvency administration responded to that claim and, the following month, in April 2015, notified the court of the insufficiency of active mass as provided for in the Insolvency Act art. 176 bis; there was a treasury of about 81, 000 euros, but the credits against the estate exceeded one million.

Later, a appeal judgment recognized a credit against the estate of 848, 000 euros to that creditor. Nevertheless, the insolvency administration did not reflect it in the quarterly reports and kept paying other credits against the estate, including their fees for liquidation generated after the notification, arguing that they were "essential expenses" to conclude the liquidation. Finally, it submitted the accounts settlement and requested the conclusion of the insolvency proceedings.

The creditor objected , alleging that the legal order of payments had been altered and requested that these accounts not be approved. The court approved them, but the Provincial Court revoked and understood that the insufficiency communication had been "reactive" (presented in response to the creditor's claim), so the order of payments under art. 176 bis. 2 could not be opposed; it disapproved the accounts and disqualified the natural person insolvency administrator for six months. The Supreme Court confirms this line, normally, after the

insufficiency communication , the outstanding mass credits are paid this line, usually, after the insufficiency communication , outstanding credits against the estate are paid following that order ; but there is an exception when communication is used as a response to a creditor's claim. In that case, payments made (e. g., "essential" fees) cannot prevail over the claimed credit, and also those fees can only be treated as pre-deductible if strictly essential actions are identified and submitted to judicial control with the creditors' hearing. If you find yourself in a situation similar to the one described, our professionals can provide you with the necessary assistance and take any actions that may be relevant.

If you find yourself in a situation similar to the one described, our professionals can provide you with timely assistance and take whatever actions may be relevant.

Contact request

* Campos obligatorios

Personal data protection.

Data controller: DÑA. CRISTINA BAZ LARRAÑAGA, 15385585B
c/ Fermín Calbetón, 4 - 3º D , Eibar (Gipuzkoa)

The purpose of the processing of your data is to respond to your queries and/or requests for information, based on your consent given when you provide your data (article 6.1.a, GDPR).
You may exercise the following rights over your data,

  • The right of information, access, rectification, objection, erasure ("to be forgotten"), restriction of
    processing, portability, non-transferability, to the limitation of processing, portability, not to be subject to automated individual decisions.
  • Remember that exercising your rights is free of charge. You can also lodge a complaint with the
    supervisory authority.

You can access the legal notice and the complete information here


Drag the arrow into the white box to activate the button